ארועי התקווה חוזרת
בפלטפורמת גינות עדן
מטעם רשת קרנות "התקווה חוזרת"
המיועדת לאמיצים, המודעים לקשיהם, אשר איבדו את תקוותם, אך
מסוגלים לזכות בה בחזרה.
Events:
20:00-23:00 11/07/20 in שבט : פאול קור16 תל
אביב
מטרתנו היא יצרת אירועים בהם אנשים מתארגנים בקבוצות
איגוד-נזיל/אחיזת-מניות-שיוויונית עם אפשרות גישה
לאנשי מקצוע המסייעים לממש את היווצרותם. אנו עושים זאת בגיט
של שרת הGitHub החינמי. הגיט הזו שייכת לקבוצה של חברים
אלה אשר הם האדמינים של הקבוצות ותכונות המיתוג שלנו
כוללות:
צבע : סגול וירוק.
פרח: לפופית נאה, באשר היא לופתת זריזה וגאה,
הלא
היא הגולרי מורנינג .
שיר: eric clapton: tears in heaven.
אביזרים: רצועות בד לבישים בצבע המיתוג.
אופן פעולה: (לבישת האביזר כ)אות הזדהות אקראית
עבור יצירת קשר לפרישת מעגל ריגעי (אולי על סדין סימלי
בצבע המיתוג), כאשר תכלית המעגל היא הזמנה
לגינת עדן מסיומת אצל מזמין מסיום הכוללת כתובת,זמן
ואודות, כאשר הארוע המתפרסם ב EdensGarden כגינת
עדן על עמוד הגינות ואשר כולל 2 סוגים : facebook
live- מעגלים וגינות.
לוגו:
הצטרפו
כאן.
From here we are creating colorful decentralized
and liquid self organized organizations
arising in our global Network of Foundations, of
which each may contribute only to humanitarian
solutions based on the beneficial movement of
people between groups in which they have equal
power:
- These organizations are structured to
prevent corruption,
when keeping diversity of all
minorities with the non-voters and the
majority, while building their critical
mass for realizing their need.
- The financing is inclusive and made only
proportional, without letting any winner
to take all, while benefiting not only
winners but also individuals, minorities
and abstention, in and between their
groups, for their participation, while
they are consuming, naturally and with low
learning curve.
- We believe that, when an economic
social system is based on the winner
takes only its proportional share, the
system causes attraction based
affiliation, whereas when such system is
based on winner-take-it-all, hate is a
conditional feeling in group
belongingness, which is destructively
tested by something like "how well do
they hates our competitors for being
privileged to live with us".
- The foundations provide, while
consulting for solutions, by having in
each foundation temporal solution projects
and, after the incubation period, each
project, becoming an external legal body,
can be contracting
with the foundation.
- This comcmoized hopeisback platform
business is of providing tools (such for
communication and storage) while caring
for good privacy by pluging authenticated
services in to the Qdolphin
browser distributed under the Humanitarian
Agpl License for the use of members
of registered organizations, which are, or
which are spinned off, the hopeisback type
of foundations listed on here,
- where such foundations may contribute
only to humanitarian solutions based on
the beneficial movement of people
between groups in which they (the
people) have equal power, specifically:
- iiaom
or hashed iiaom used as the identity
in federal services (with rss bridge)
providing xmpp/ommemo
or matrix,
- where the members' details, such
as mac and ip addresses, are only
stored hashed while allowing
anonymization with vpn service
bridging also the tor
usage from the qdolphin browser for
accessing also main stream platforms
such as google and facebook also
from different devices and locations
on the glob.
The core of our development in all
metropolises starts
in pair of activities by both hands - the
degentrification hand and the comcomized
real-estate hand.
As gentrification became the first issue of
most people living in (big) cities worldwide
and is allways the dark-side reality of the
lunatic myth named economic growth, of which
basic is crediting the privileged and which
forces people to be deported from their home
and from the economy they are actually making,
while cynically, giving more opportunities for
the rich ones to become richer:
- Here are 2 steps degentrification
(undo gentrification) in pair of steps:
- the first step is of liquid unions of
which branches are served by lawyers and
providing storage places, temporal
accommodations, moving and sharing staff
and information centers for renters and
- the second step, which will be
triggered after reaching some critical
mass of participants being also equal
share holders in their comcomized units,
created for lending the necessary money to
create guaranties for the renters wishing
to buy their apartment by their renting
payments.
- Many levels (e.g. from 100 to 1m) of same
investment value in some scomcom all of
which d=1 while investing in a noncomcom
real-estate entity, having only scomcom
investors and a predefined maximal
individual investment - here are the main
benefits:
- small investors could benefit from the
advantages offered to the bigger ones,
since mostly the offers in the real estate
market are such that the bigger the
investment is the lower is the risk and/or
the bigger is the yield.
- per each holder, in the same scomcom,
any other holder can only be of the same
power, allowing participation of unknown
many other holder with lower risk coming
from them.
- after the investment still the holders
can migrate between such scomsom with out
damaging the whole real-estate entity.
The comcomized
agreement of equal ownership is made
to avoid been taken over by the huge
corporations, while giving a room for
cooperating with some "normal" business
making, where
- its profit is sheared between its
owners correspondingly to their
investments,
- its root decisions are made such
that one vote is of one of its
owning SComCom or of owner of its
owning ScomCom,
- its founder owners have some
voting privileges additional to ones
such as being the first offered
investor for the players in the
platform,
- its projects are where its
players prepare themselves to become
another of its owning Scomcom and
- any Scomcom owning the platform
is not owned by the platform, while
the platform may form and own other
companies also for implementing its
projects players tasks until selling
that to their Scomcom to be then
partnering in the ownership over the
platform.
Here are some example of concrete solutions:
-
Shifting public opinion, such as
convincing the citizens to
participate in green energy campaign
as green comcom owners (see the BIS green swan risks report),
-
A
"publish house platform of the
creative people/class", which is
owned only by companies being partly
owned equally by artists and/or
developers, as the other fixed part
is owned by their
producers/investors (here is the
precise agreement: Scomcoms)
here is a coworking spaces
map for spreading our
mission,
- Connecting people owned by their
comcom and not by huge company as
facebook, twitter, google or telegram,
- our core of
development including the real
estate comcom and granting concom
granting grantees/insurance to its
members
- GovComCom
by making any bailout-privatization-cycle
together with the criticizes involved as
comcom players instead of only some few
huge companies
- A media platform integrated with
liquid union being umbrella body for
small business and their customers being
also equal owners in Scomcom channels
financed by adds of those business and
owning the platform.
- An investment platform :
the Liquid union
model of fair distribution (compared
with liquid/delegative- democracy telling
how to decide and produce or serve, liquid
union is about how to get organized to get
and choose between services and products) -
here are some example of concrete solutions:
- the national citizens payment for tv
station can be made for liquid union
having projects such as entertainment,
investigation, education, culture,
art-development, etc, where each of
which projects has its channels financed
proportional to number of participants
in the channel, so that also the voices
of minorities and non-voter would be
heard too,
the Qdolphin
browser, A browser for smart people
developed confined providing progressive web
app user experience configured by qt/qml
with encryption feature: 3fish1kbit in ctr
mode by contextual kdf2 key, producing 4k
files, each having different strong key
strengthening the weakest ring of any
security chain being the human passcode,
Compared with other foundations,
accumulation in HopeIsBack foundations is
made by more emancipative authorizations
which are to be proven less by looping
"proofs by gun as in fiat money",
- where normalization of any
establishment is always tested by an
inverse of its "calls for legitimating
loop of proof by gun", as storing any
value of such establishment is
normalized by trying some non yet
trusted statements via these 3 "proofs":
- of call as a bet and/or a stake,
- of routine as work and/or function
and
- of destruction of routines or calls
by enforcement and/or education,
- where these distractions are
attributed and rerouted (back) to
some (of its authoritative) fiat (as
a) call and are made by police,
armies, media, schools, churches
and/or other distractions and
obstacles, which are generally
coined here as
- "calls for legitimating constant
routine of proof by gun".
From here we are creating colorful decentralized and liquid self organized organizations arising in our global Network of Foundations, of which each may contribute only to humanitarian solutions based on the beneficial movement of people between groups in which they have equal power:
- These organizations are structured to prevent corruption, when keeping diversity of all minorities with the non-voters and the majority, while building their critical mass for realizing their need.
- The financing is inclusive and made only proportional, without letting any winner to take all, while benefiting not only winners but also individuals, minorities and abstention, in and between their groups, for their participation, while they are consuming, naturally and with low learning curve.
- We believe that, when an economic social system is based on the winner takes only its proportional share, the system causes attraction based affiliation, whereas when such system is based on winner-take-it-all, hate is a conditional feeling in group belongingness, which is destructively tested by something like "how well do they hates our competitors for being privileged to live with us".
- The foundations provide, while consulting for solutions, by having in each foundation temporal solution projects and, after the incubation period, each project, becoming an external legal body, can be contracting with the foundation.
- This comcmoized hopeisback platform business is of providing tools (such for communication and storage) while caring for good privacy by pluging authenticated services in to the Qdolphin browser distributed under the Humanitarian Agpl License for the use of members of registered organizations, which are, or which are spinned off, the hopeisback type of foundations listed on here,
- where such foundations may contribute only to humanitarian solutions based on the beneficial movement of people between groups in which they (the people) have equal power, specifically:
- iiaom or hashed iiaom used as the identity in federal services (with rss bridge) providing xmpp/ommemo or matrix,
- where the members' details, such as mac and ip addresses, are only stored hashed while allowing anonymization with vpn service bridging also the tor usage from the qdolphin browser for accessing also main stream platforms such as google and facebook also from different devices and locations on the glob.
The core of our development in all metropolises starts in pair of activities by both hands - the degentrification hand and the comcomized real-estate hand.
As gentrification became the first issue of most people living in (big) cities worldwide and is allways the dark-side reality of the lunatic myth named economic growth, of which basic is crediting the privileged and which forces people to be deported from their home and from the economy they are actually making, while cynically, giving more opportunities for the rich ones to become richer:
- Here are 2 steps degentrification (undo gentrification) in pair of steps:
- the first step is of liquid unions of which branches are served by lawyers and providing storage places, temporal accommodations, moving and sharing staff and information centers for renters and
- the second step, which will be triggered after reaching some critical mass of participants being also equal share holders in their comcomized units, created for lending the necessary money to create guaranties for the renters wishing to buy their apartment by their renting payments.
- Many levels (e.g. from 100 to 1m) of same investment value in some scomcom all of which d=1 while investing in a noncomcom real-estate entity, having only scomcom investors and a predefined maximal individual investment - here are the main benefits:
- small investors could benefit from the advantages offered to the bigger ones, since mostly the offers in the real estate market are such that the bigger the investment is the lower is the risk and/or the bigger is the yield.
- per each holder, in the same scomcom, any other holder can only be of the same power, allowing participation of unknown many other holder with lower risk coming from them.
- after the investment still the holders can migrate between such scomsom with out damaging the whole real-estate entity.
- its profit is sheared between its owners correspondingly to their investments,
- its root decisions are made such that one vote is of one of its owning SComCom or of owner of its owning ScomCom,
- its founder owners have some voting privileges additional to ones such as being the first offered investor for the players in the platform,
- its projects are where its players prepare themselves to become another of its owning Scomcom and
- any Scomcom owning the platform is not owned by the platform, while the platform may form and own other companies also for implementing its projects players tasks until selling that to their Scomcom to be then partnering in the ownership over the platform.
-
Shifting public opinion, such as convincing the citizens to participate in green energy campaign as green comcom owners (see the BIS green swan risks report),
-
A "publish house platform of the creative people/class", which is owned only by companies being partly owned equally by artists and/or developers, as the other fixed part is owned by their producers/investors (here is the precise agreement: Scomcoms) here is a coworking spaces map for spreading our mission,
- Connecting people owned by their comcom and not by huge company as facebook, twitter, google or telegram,
- our core of development including the real estate comcom and granting concom granting grantees/insurance to its members
- GovComCom by making any bailout-privatization-cycle together with the criticizes involved as comcom players instead of only some few huge companies
- A media platform integrated with liquid union being umbrella body for small business and their customers being also equal owners in Scomcom channels financed by adds of those business and owning the platform.
- An investment platform :
- the national citizens payment for tv station can be made for liquid union having projects such as entertainment, investigation, education, culture, art-development, etc, where each of which projects has its channels financed proportional to number of participants in the channel, so that also the voices of minorities and non-voter would be heard too,
Compared with other foundations, accumulation in HopeIsBack foundations is made by more emancipative authorizations which are to be proven less by looping "proofs by gun as in fiat money",
- where normalization of any establishment is always tested by an inverse of its "calls for legitimating loop of proof by gun", as storing any value of such establishment is normalized by trying some non yet trusted statements via these 3 "proofs":
- of call as a bet and/or a stake,
- of routine as work and/or function and
- of destruction of routines or calls by enforcement and/or education,
- where these distractions are attributed and rerouted (back) to some (of its authoritative) fiat (as a) call and are made by police, armies, media, schools, churches and/or other distractions and obstacles, which are generally coined here as
- "calls for legitimating constant routine of proof by gun".
Erez Elul and Rechtsanwalt Moritz Heusinger are the initial co-owners of the founder ScomCom of scomcoms platforms.
See also how anyone can do something.. Are you doing #art4HopeIsBack?
- join the international network we are to create to assist your work;
- be refereed in our platform serving critical mass of people to supply your services with your expertise for the humanitarian and citizens rights issues when appeared in or via our platform and
- please recommend us to lawyers able to register and represents the foundations and their spin of organizations
- HopeIsBack network mark or Tm
- F being a mark or Tm of the foundation serving specific subdomain in hopeisback
- P being a mark or Tm of the project in the foundation serving specific subdomain in comcomized or liquidunions
- X being a requiter number that must be feed in the registration to that site (zero for volunteers and optionally with additional security measure like another secret code).
- Abstract makers who bring new ideas as for how to implement the statute
- Concept mentors of these ideas
- Fundraisers for the concepts
- Project manager realizing the funded concept
This platform is to serve the need of (a lot of) paperwork for the organizations being spin-off from its foundations with internationally recruited lawyers and then providing feedback tools, by first applying to lawyers with proven activity supporting humanitarian and citizens rights with these three proposals:
The hopeisback low cost recruiting is distributed by requiters via personal cards, flayers, sticker , (e)mail, etc with the following 4 elements:
You may contribute or apply to membership, board of directors or trustees or add yourself as its participants. We are now looking for these 4 initiating team members: